Acute Adverse Events After BNT162b2 mRNA and Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in People who had COVID-19 Vaccines

Objective: Considering the classical vaccine development processes, COVID-19 vaccines were developed in a concise period. However, safety cannot be compromised for the rapid development of vaccines. Therefore, we aimed to in-vestigate and compare the incidence of acute adverse events between vaccine doses and vaccine types in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 and those who were not.Method: The study was conducted prospectively between July 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and the Sinovac inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) were recruited in the cohort study. The cohort was divided into two vaccine categories and sub-branches: those with COVID-19 in each vaccine category and those without. Eight days after the vaccination, all participants in the cohort were provided with an assessment questionnaire regarding the adverse events they experienced.Results: A total of 1607 vaccine doses were followed in the study, 18.7% (n=301) of which were the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and 81.3% (n=1306) were the BNT162b2 vaccine. According to the statistics, the risk of developing adverse events with the BNT162b2 vaccine was shown to be 5.8 times higher than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (OR: 5.83;95% CI: 4.34-7.84). In addition, the risk of suffering such adverse events was 1.6 times higher in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (OR: 1.61;95% CI: 1.29-2.00) as opposed to patients who were not.Conclusion: Based on the results, we can conclude that acute adverse events were more prevalent after vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Furthermore, compared to those who did not have COVID-19, it was evident that patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 were prone to experience mild, temporary, and manageable adverse events.

Effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children and adolescents: a large-scale observational study.

Background: Policymakers urgently need evidence to adequately balance the costs and benefits of mass vaccination against COVID-19 across all age groups, including children and adolescents. In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac's primary series among children and adolescents in Chile. Methods: We used a large prospective national cohort of about two million children and adolescents 6-16 years to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), hospitalisation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) associated with COVID-19. We compared the risk of individuals treated with a complete primary immunization schedule (two doses, 28 days apart) with the risk of unvaccinated individuals during the follow-up period. The study was conducted in Chile from June 27, 2021, to January 12, 2022, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was predominant but other variants of concern were co-circulating, including Omicron. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of complete immunization over the unvaccinated status, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. Findings: The estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 6-16 years was 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8-75.2), 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4) for the prevention of COVID-19, hospitalisation, and ICU admission, respectively. For the subgroup of children 6-11 years, the vaccine effectiveness was 75.8% (95% CI, 74.7-76.8) for the prevention of COVID-19 and 77.9% (95% CI, 61.5-87.3) for the prevention of hospitalisation. Interpretation: Our results suggest that a complete primary immunization schedule with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provides effective protection against severe COVID-19 disease for children 6-16 years. Funding: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) Millennium Science Initiative Program and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP).

Characterizing the cellular and molecular variabilities of peripheral immune cells in healthy recipients of BBIBP-CorV inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine by single-cell RNA sequencing.

Over 3 billion doses of inactivated vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been administered globally. However, our understanding of the immune cell functional transcription and T cell receptor (TCR)/B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire dynamics following inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination remains poorly understood. Here, we performed single-cell RNA and TCR/BCR sequencing on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at four time points after immunization with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BBIBP-CorV. Our analysis revealed an enrichment of monocytes, central memory CD4+ T cells, type 2 helper T cells and memory B cells following vaccination. Single-cell TCR-seq and RNA-seq comminating analysis identified a clonal expansion of CD4+ T cells (but not CD8+ T cells) following a booster vaccination that corresponded to a decrease in the TCR diversity of central memory CD4+ T cells and type 2 helper T cells. Importantly, these TCR repertoire changes and CD4+ T cell differentiation were correlated with the biased VJ gene usage of BCR and the antibody-producing function of B cells post-vaccination. Finally, we compared the functional transcription and repertoire dynamics in immune cells elicited by vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection to explore the immune responses under different stimuli. Our data provide novel molecular and cellular evidence for the CD4+ T cell-dependent antibody response induced by inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV. This information is urgently needed to develop new prevention and control strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871932).

Impaired Humoral Immunity Identified in Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Recipients without Anti-Spike RBD Antibodies.

Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been deployed in a significant portion of the world population, who have widely varied responses to vaccination. Understanding this differential response would help the development of new vaccines for non-responders. Here, we conducted surveillance of anti-Spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody levels in a large cohort of 534 healthy Chinese subjects vaccinated with two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We show that the positive rate of antibodies among vaccinated subjects rapidly wanes as the interval between antibody testing and vaccination increases (14 to 119 days: 81.03%, 363 of 448 subjects; 120 to 149 days: 46.43%, 13 of 28 subjects; more than 150 days: 20%, 1 of 5 subjects). However, the antibodies were maintained at high levels in 16 convalescent COVID-19 patients at more than 150 days after recovery. We also found that increased age and body mass index are associated with decreased antibody levels. Vaccinated subjects who fail to produce antibodies display impaired B-cell activating humoral immunity, which was confirmed in COVID-19 patients without antibodies detected at 4 to 18 days after diagnosis. IMPORTANCE Our study illustrates the immune responses engaged by encountering antigen, highlighting the critical roles of B-cell activating humoral immunity in the body's antibody production.

Increased body mass index linked to decreased neutralizing antibody titers of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthcare workers.

Objective: Obesity is an important risk factor for COVID-19. However, whether obesity affects SARS-CoV-2 antibody production is unclear. This study aimed to identify the influence of obesity on neutralizing antibody production of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to better guide vaccination strategies. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited a total of 239 healthcare workers (age, 21-50 years) from Suining Central Hospital during 22-23 April 2021. An electronic questionnaire on basic characteristics was completed by all participants. A general physical exam and fasting blood sampling by venipuncture were performed. Peripheral leukocyte counts and the ratios of leukocyte subsets, hepatorenal function, and the neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 were measured. Results: Among 239 healthcare workers, the participants with underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity accounted for 10.88%, 64.44%, 23.01%, and 1.67%, respectively. The highest peripheral monocyte counts were observed in the group with obesity, whereas the lowest were observed in the group with normal weight. Similar results were obtained with respect to percentage of peripheral monocytes. Participants with obesity had higher peripheral eosinophil counts and percentages than the other three groups. The median neutralizing antibody titer was 12.70 AU/mL, with 85.36% (n = 204) of participants were sufficiently protected against SARS-CoV-2. The lowest neutralizing antibody titers were observed in the group with obesity, whereas the highest were observed in the group that was underweight. Additionally, high BMI was significantly associated with high peripheral monocyte counts [B (95% CI) = 0.008 (0.002, 0.013)] and low neutralizing antibody titers [B (95% CI) = -1.934 (-3.663, -0.206)]. Conclusions: Obesity could induce chronic inflammation, and associated with lower neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 after inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Acute Adverse Events After BNT162b2 mRNA and Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in People who had COVID-19 Vaccines.

Objective: Considering the classical vaccine development processes, COVID-19 vaccines were developed in a concise period. However, safety cannot be compromised for the rapid development of vaccines. Therefore, we aimed to in-vestigate and compare the incidence of acute adverse events between vaccine doses and vaccine types in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 and those who were not. Method(s): The study was conducted prospectively between July 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and the Sinovac inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) were recruited in the cohort study. The cohort was divided into two vaccine categories and sub-branches: those with COVID-19 in each vaccine category and those without. Eight days after the vaccination, all participants in the cohort were provided with an assessment questionnaire regarding the adverse events they experienced. Result(s): A total of 1607 vaccine doses were followed in the study, 18.7% (n=301) of which were the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and 81.3% (n=1306) were the BNT162b2 vaccine. According to the statistics, the risk of developing adverse events with the BNT162b2 vaccine was shown to be 5.8 times higher than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (OR: 5.83;95% CI: 4.34-7.84). In addition, the risk of suffering such adverse events was 1.6 times higher in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (OR: 1.61;95% CI: 1.29-2.00) as opposed to patients who were not. Conclusion(s): Based on the results, we can conclude that acute adverse events were more prevalent after vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Furthermore, compared to those who did not have COVID-19, it was evident that patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 were prone to experience mild, temporary, and manageable adverse events. Copyright © 2022, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary atherosclerosis disease in China: a prospective cohort study.

AIMS: Publicized adverse events after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) raised concern among patients with coronary atherosclerosis disease (CAD). We sought to study the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and long-term clinical outcomes including ischaemic and bleeding events among patients with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Inpatients diagnosed with CAD by coronary angiography, without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, were included between 1 January and 30 April 2021, and underwent follow-up until 31 January 2022. Two doses of inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, BBIBPCorV, or WIBP-CorV) were available after discharge, and the group was stratified by vaccination. The primary composite outcomes were cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularization, ischaemic stroke, venous thrombo-embolism, or peripheral arterial thrombosis. The bleeding outcomes were Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding. Cox regression models with vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for the outcomes. A propensity score matching method was used to reduce confounding biases. This prospective cohort study included 2078 individuals with CAD, 1021 (49.1%) were vaccinated. During a median follow-up of 9.1 months, 45 (4.3%) primary composite outcomes occurred in the unvaccinated group, and 33 (3.2%) in the vaccinated group. In Cox regression, the adjusted HR was 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.93]. The adjusted HR for the bleeding outcomes associated with vaccination was 0.81 [95% CI 0.35-1.19]. After matching, the adjusted HR for the primary composite outcomes associated with vaccination was 1.06 [95% CI 0.57-1.99] and for the bleeding outcomes was 0.91 [95% CI 0.35-2.38]. Similar results were found in the seven prespecified subgroups. No grade 3 adverse reactions after vaccination were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated no evidence of an increased ischaemic or bleeding risk after vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among Chinese patients with CAD, with limited statistical power.

Effects of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on male fertility: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have revealed severe damage to male fertility from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, raising concerns about the potential adverse impact on reproductive function of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine developed based on the virus. Interestingly, there are several researchers who have studied the impact of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine since then but have come up with conflicting results. As a near-ideal candidate for mass immunization programs, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been widely used in many countries, particularly in less wealthy nations. However, little is known about its effect on male fertility. METHODS: Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single large center for reproductive medicine in China between December 2021 and August 2022. 519 fertile men with no history of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included and categorized into four groups based on their vaccination status: unvaccinated group (n=168), one-dose vaccinated group (n=8), fully vaccinated group (n=183), and booster group (n=160). All of them underwent a semen analysis and most had serum sex hormone levels tested. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in all semen parameters and sex hormone levels between the unvaccinated group and either vaccinated group. To account for possible vaccination-to-test interval-specific changes, sub-analyses were performed for two interval groups: ≤90 and >90 days. As expected, most of the semen parameters and sex hormone levels remained unchanged between the control and vaccinated groups. However, participants in vaccinated group (≤90 days) have decreased total sperm motility and increased FSH level compared with the ones in unvaccinated group. Moreover, some trends similar to those found during COVID-19 infection and recovery were observed in our study. Fortunately, all values are within the normal range. In addition, vaccinated participants reported few adverse reactions. No special medical intervention was required, and no serious adverse reactions happened. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not impair male fertility, possibly due to the low frequency of adverse effects. This information reassures young male population who got this vaccine worldwide, and helps guide future vaccination efforts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Membranous Nephropathy following Full-Dose of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Virus Vaccination: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) has proven to be the most effective measure to prevent the spread and reduce infection severity. A case report of de novo membranous nephropathy (MN) following immunization with inactivated virus vaccine (CoronaVac®, Sinovac Biotech) is presented here. A 53-year-old man presented with a sudden onset of leg edema a week after receiving an inactivated virus vaccine and a relapse of nephrotic syndrome (NS) with acute kidney injury (AKI) after a booster dose. Screening for serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody and secondary causes of MN were negative. Kidney biopsy revealed an early MN pattern with focal spike formation, whilst numerous subepithelial electron-dense deposits and a few small deposits in the mesangial area were observed through electron microscopy. A short course of steroids and oral cyclophosphamide was prescribed, resulting in the complete remission of NS and AKI. MN following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination should call for medical importance. Awareness of the association between vaccination and MN should be kept in mind to avoid unnecessary treatment with long-term immunosuppressive agents.

Acute Adverse Events After BNT162b2 mRNA and Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in People who had COVID-19 Vaccines

Objective: Considering the classical vaccine development processes, COVID-19 vaccines were developed in a concise period. However, safety cannot be compromised for the rapid development of vaccines. Therefore, we aimed to in-vestigate and compare the incidence of acute adverse events between vaccine doses and vaccine types in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 and those who were not. Method(s): The study was conducted prospectively between July 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and the Sinovac inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) were recruited in the cohort study. The cohort was divided into two vaccine categories and sub-branches: those with COVID-19 in each vaccine category and those without. Eight days after the vaccination, all participants in the cohort were provided with an assessment questionnaire regarding the adverse events they experienced. Result(s): A total of 1607 vaccine doses were followed in the study, 18.7% (n=301) of which were the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and 81.3% (n=1306) were the BNT162b2 vaccine. According to the statistics, the risk of developing adverse events with the BNT162b2 vaccine was shown to be 5.8 times higher than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (OR: 5.83;95% CI: 4.34-7.84). In addition, the risk of suffering such adverse events was 1.6 times higher in patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (OR: 1.61;95% CI: 1.29-2.00) as opposed to patients who were not. Conclusion(s): Based on the results, we can conclude that acute adverse events were more prevalent after vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine than the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Furthermore, compared to those who did not have COVID-19, it was evident that patients who were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 were prone to experience mild, temporary, and manageable adverse events. Copyright © 2022, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Impacts of delta and omicron variants on inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced T cell responses in patients with autoimmune diseases and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is still devastating economies and communities globally. The increasing infections of variants of concern (VOCs) in vaccinated population have raised concerns about the effectiveness of current vaccines. Patients with autoimmune diseases (PAD) under immunosuppressant treatments are facing higher risk of infection and potentially lower immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from PAD or healthy controls (HC) who finished two or three doses of inactivated vaccines. Spike peptides derived from wild-type strain, delta, omicron BA.1 were utilised to evaluate T cell responses and their cross-recognition of delta and omicron in HC and PAD by flow cytometry and ex vivo IFNγ-ELISpot. RESULTS: We found that inactivated vaccine-induced spike-specific memory T cells were long-lasting in both PAD and HC. These spike-specific T cells were highly conserved and cross-recognized delta and omicron. Moreover, a third inactivated vaccine expanded spike-specific T cells that responded to delta and omicron spike peptides substantially in both PAD and HC. Importantly, the polyfunctionality of spike-specific memory T cells was preserved in terms of cytokine and cytotoxic responses. Although the extent of T cell responses was lower in PAD after two-dose, T cell responses were boosted to a greater magnitude in PAD by the third dose, bringing comparable spike-specific T cell immunity after the third dose. CONCLUSION: Inactivated vaccine-induced spike-specific T cells remain largely intact against delta and omicron variants. This study expands our understanding of inactivated vaccine-induced T cell responses in PAD and HC, which could have important indications for vaccination strategy.

Different Formulations of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidates in Human Compatible Adjuvants: Potency Studies in Mice Showed Different Platforms of Immune Responses.

Several inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for human use, but are not highly potent. In this study, different formulations of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus were developed in Alum, Montanide 51VG, and Montanide ISA720VG adjuvants, followed by assessment of immune responses. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was inactivated with formalin and formulated in the adjuvants. BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 4 µg of vaccines on days 0 and 14; (IL-4) and (IFN-g), cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, and specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer and IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2a/IgG1 ratio, and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG response were assessed 2 weeks after the final immunization. Immunization with SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG showed a significant increase in the IFN-γ cytokine versus SARS-CoV-2-Alum, SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA720VG, and control groups (p < 0.0033). Cytokine IL-4 response in SARS-CoV-2-Alum group showed a significant increase compared with SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG, SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA720VG, and control groups (p < 0.0206). In addition, SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG vaccine induced the highest IFN-γ/IL-4 cytokine ratio versus other groups (p < 0.0004). CTL activity in SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG and SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA720VG groups showed a significant increase compared with SARS-CoV-2-Alum and control groups (p < 0.0075). Specific IgG titer in SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51 VG and SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA720VG showed a significant increase compared with SARS-CoV-2-Alum and control groups (p < 0.0143). Results from specific IgG1and IgG2a in SARS-CoV-2-Alum, SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG, and SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA720VG vaccine showed a significant increase compared with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) group (p < 0.0001), but SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG and SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA 720VG groups showed the highest IgG2a/IgG1 ratio and a significant increase compared with SARS-CoV-2-Alum group (p < 0.0379). Moreover, inactivated SARS-CoV-2+Alum and SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA 720VG groups demonstrated a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG response versus the SARS-CoV-2-Montanide ISA51VG group. It seems that the type of vaccine formulation is a critical parameter, influencing the immunologic pattern and vaccine potency and human-compatible oil-based adjuvants were more potent than Alum adjuvant in the vaccine formulation.

Third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine for patients with RA: Focusing on immunogenicity and effects of RA drugs.

Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity of the third dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and explore the effect of RA drugs on vaccine immunogenicity. Methods: We recruited RA patients (n = 222) and healthy controls (HC, n = 177) who had been injected with a third dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and their neutralizing antibody (NAb) titer levels were assessed. Results: RA patients and HC were age- and gender-matched, and the mean interval between 3rd vaccination and sampling was comparable. The NAb titers were significantly lower in RA patients after the third immunization compared with HC. The positive rate of NAb in HC group was 90.4%, while that in RA patients was 80.18%, and the difference was significant. Furthermore, comparison of NAb titers between RA treatment subgroups and HC showed that the patients in the conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) group exhibited no significant change in NAb titers, while in those receiving the treatment of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and prednisone, the NAb titers were significantly lower. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that NAb responses to SARS-CoV-2 in HC did differ significantly according to the interval between 3rd vaccination and sampling, but this finding was not observed in RA patients. In addition, NAb titers were not significantly correlated with RA-related laboratory indicators, including RF-IgA, RF-IgG, RF-IgM, anti-CCP antibody; C-RP; ESR; NEUT% and LYMPH%. Conclusion: Serum antibody responses to the third dose of vaccine in RA patients were weaker than HC. Our study will help to evaluate the efficacy and safety of booster vaccination in RA patients and provide further guidance for adjusting vaccination strategies.

Reduced antibody response to COVID-19 vaccine composed of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 in diabetic individuals.

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at increased risk for COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality. Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccine in T2DM patients is not very clear. The present work aims to evaluate the antibody response to the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in this population. Methods: Two groups of subjects with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were included: 63 T2DM patients and 56 non-T2DM controls. Each participant received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. IgG antibodies against the nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-N/S IgG) and receptor binding domain (RBD) proteins (anti-RBD IgG) were quantitatively evaluated by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassays, respectively. Results: It was observed that the positive rates and titers of anti-N/S IgG and anti-RBD IgG in T2DM patients were significantly lower than those in controls, respectively (anti-N/S: 85.7 vs. 98.2%, P = 0.034; 25.48 vs. 33.58 AU/ml P = 0.011; anti-RBD: 85.7 vs. 96.4%, P = 0.044; 15.45 vs. 22.25 AU/ml, P = 0.019). Compared to non-T2DM subjects, T2DM patients with uncontrolled glycemia showed lower positive antibody rates and titers (anti-N/S IgG: 75% and 13.30 AU/ml; anti-RBD IgG: 75% and 11.91 AU/ml, respectively, all P < 0.05), while T2DM patients with controlled glycemia had similar positive antibody rates and titers (anti-N/S IgG: 94.3% and 33.65 AU/ml; and anti-RBD IgG: 94.3% and 19.82 AU/ml, respectively, all P > 0.05). Conclusion: In the analysis performed, the data indicate that T2DM patients with uncontrolled glycemia showed a lower level of IgG antibodies compared to non-diabetic controls and individuals with controlled glycemia when immunized with the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine.

Early Humoral Responses of Hemodialysis Patients After Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

Purpose: To detect antibody responses to inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in patients undergoing hemodialysis and to investigate vaccine-related adverse events. Patients and Methods: A total of 120 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 24 healthy controls (HCs) who had not been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and had received their first dose of the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac; Sinovac Biotech Ltd) were recruited for this study. All participants were scheduled to receive a second dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Serum-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 were detected at least 14 days after the second dose of vaccine using a commercial kit. Positive and negative results were defined as a sample/cutoff (S/CO) ratio≥1.00 and <1.00, respectively. Vaccination-related adverse events were assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Results: There were no significant differences regarding the seroprevalences of IgG and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and the self-reported vaccination-related adverse events between HD patients and HCs. The analysis results for HD patients suggest that 82 (68.3%) and 27 (22.5%) tested positive for IgG and IgM, respectively. The levels of IgG were higher than IgM levels (P<0.0001). In addition, the IgG-positive group had significantly higher serum albumin levels than the IgG-negative group (P<0.05). Only mild vaccine-related adverse events were observed in two patients (1.66%) and in one healthy individual (4.2%). Conclusion: The seroprevalences of IgG and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination-related adverse effects are similar between HD and HCs. The inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is effective and safe in inducing near-term immunity in hemodialysis patients.

T-Cell Responses Induced by an Intradermal BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Following Primary Vaccination with Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

A practical booster vaccine is urgently needed to control the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. We have previously reported the safety and immunogenicity of a fractional intradermal booster, using the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in healthy volunteers who had completed two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In this study, an intramuscular booster at full dosage was used as a control, and a half-dose vaccination was included for reciprocal comparison. Detailed T-cell studies are essential to understand cellular responses to vaccination. T-cell immunity was examined using S1 peptide restimulation and flow cytometry. The fractional dose (1:5) of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine enhanced antigen-specific effector T-cells, but the responses were less remarkable compared to the intramuscular booster at full dosage. However, the intradermal regimen was not inferior to the intramuscular booster a month after boosting. An intradermal booster using only one-fifth of the standard dosage could provide comparable T-cell responses with the fractional intramuscular booster. This work confirms the efficacy of intradermal and fractional vaccination in terms of T-cell immunogenicity in previously immunised populations.

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) coadministered with quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in China: A multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial.

BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of the coadministration of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV), quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4), and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) in adults in China is unknown. METHODS: In this open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited from the community. Individuals were eligible if they had no history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine or any pneumonia vaccine and had not received an influenza vaccine during the 2020-21 influenza season. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using block randomization stratified, to either: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and IIV4 followed by SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and PPV23 (SARS-CoV-2 + IIV4/PPV23 group); two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (SARS-CoV-2 vaccine group); or IIV4 followed by PPV23 (IIV4/PPV23 group). Vaccines were administered 28 days apart, with blood samples taken on day 0 and day 28 before vaccination, and on day 56. RESULTS: Between March 10 and March 15, 2021, 1152 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups (384 per group). 1132 participants were included in the per-protocol population (375 in the SARS-CoV-2 + IIV4/PPV23 group, 380 in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine group, and 377 in the IIV4/PPV23 group). The seroconversion rate (100 % vs 100 %) and GMT (159.13 vs 173.20; GMT ratio of 0.92 [95 % CI 0.83 to 1.02]) of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies in the SARS-CoV-2 + IIV4/PPV23 group was not inferior to those in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine group. The SARS-CoV-2 + IIV4/PPV23 group was not inferior to the IIV4/PPV23 group in terms of seroconversion rates and GMT of influenza virus antibodies for all strains except for the seroconversion rate for the B/Yamagata strain. The SARS-CoV-2 + IIV4/PPV23 group was not inferior to the IIV4/PPV23 group regarding seroconversion rates and GMC of Streptococcus pneumoniae IgG antibodies specific to all serotypes. All vaccines were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and IIV4/PPV23 is safe with satisfactory immunogenicity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04790851.

Vaccination with the Inactivated Vaccine (Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) Ensures Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease.

Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become an important public health solution. Developing a safe and effective vaccine against COVID-19 is a viable long-term solution to control the pandemic. As one of the two inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines developed in China that entered the WHO emergency use list, Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV, an aluminum-hydroxide-adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus vaccine, has been widely distributed, with more than 400 million doses administered in more than 40 countries. The evidence of the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV is gathered and reviewed. We further comment on one of the latest papers that disclosed the effectiveness results between BBIBP-CorV, rAd26-rAd5, and ChAdOx1.

Immunogenicity of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Series.

Objectives: Attenuated humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been reported in some patients with autoimmune disease, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data of immune responses to inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the RA population are still unknown. Herein, the safety and immunogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in RA patients were analyzed. Methods: Seventy five RA patients and 26 healthy controls (HC) were respectively recruited from Yunnan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the community in Kunming city. Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Test ELISA kit was used to measure the percentage of inhibition. AKA (anti-keratin antibody) positivity was detected using indirect immunofluorescence. Rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgA was detected by ELISA. RF-IgG, RF-IgM, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies were measured by chemiluminescence. ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) was detected by ESR analyzer. C-RP (c-reactive protein) was detected by immunoturbidimetry. NEUT% (percentage of neutrophils) and LYMPH% (percentage of percentage) were calculated by a calculation method. Results: Compared with the HC group, the percentage of inhibition was significantly lower in RA patients receiving two doses of vaccines. Vaccines-induced percentage of inhibition was the lowest in RA patients who had not been vaccinated. In total 80.77% of the HC group had a percentage of inhibition ≧20%, compared with 45.24% of vaccinated RA patients and 6.06% of unvaccinated RA patients. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 did not differ between RA patients according to their age and disease duration. Furthermore, the results showed that no correlation was found between the percentage of inhibition and indices for RA, including RF-IgA, IgG, IgM; anti-CCP antibody; ESR; C-RP; NEUT% and LYMPH%. Conclusion: Our study showed inactivated vaccine-induced SARS-COV-2 antibody responses differ in RA patients and healthy subjects, emphasizing the importance of a third or fourth vaccination in RA patients.

The Effect of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on TRAB in Graves' Disease.

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced the development of vaccines. Reports have suggested that vaccines play a role in inducing autoimmune diseases (AIDs). Scattered cases have reported that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines may promote thyroid disease, including Graves' disease (GD). However, the effect of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on GD remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the response of thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAB) to inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to observe the differences in thyroid function and TRAB trends between pre-vaccination (n=412) and post-vaccination (n=231) groups at an interval of 2 months. We then retrospectively observed the differences in serum thyroid function and TRAB levels at 3 months before (n=280), 1 month before (n=294), 1 month after (n=306), and 3 months after (n=250) vaccination. Subsequently, 173 GD patients who were not vaccinated with inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccines were selected for a prospective study. Thyroid function and TRAB assessment were performed before 3 and 1 months and 1 and 3 months after the first dose of vaccination and were then compared by repeated measures ANOVA to explore their dynamic changes. Results: A retrospective study preliminarily observed that the trend of TRAB post-vaccination was opposite of that pre-vaccination (p=0.000), serum TRAB levels decreased before vaccination and increased after vaccination. In this prospective study, repeated measures ANOVA indicated significant differences in serum FT3 (p=0.000), FT4 (p=0.000), TSH (p=0.000), and TRAB (p=0.000) levels at different time points before and after vaccination. Serum TRAB levels showed dynamic changes that decreased significantly at 1 month before vaccination (p=0.000), no significant differences at 1 month after vaccination (p=0.583), and reflected an upward trend at 3 months after vaccination (p=0.034). Serum FT3 and FT4 levels showed similar trends to serum TRAB levels before and after vaccination. Instead, the serum TSH levels showed a continuous upward trend over time. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained in both retrospective and prospective studies, we concluded that serum TRAB levels decreased less after inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and showed an upward trend, which may be related to humoral immunity induced by vaccination.